false
OasisLMS
Catalog
APEX Shoulder Mastering Surgical Techniques for Cl ...
When is a Bankart Not Enough_ Factors to Consider
When is a Bankart Not Enough_ Factors to Consider
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
Video Summary
Michael O'Brien from Tulane University discusses when an arthroscopic Bankart repair alone is insufficient for anterior shoulder instability. Key reasons include significant glenoid bone loss (over 20-25%), bipolar defects with engaging Hill-Sachs lesions, and revision surgeries. Bone loss under 10% generally allows successful Bankart repair; 10-20% ("subcritical") is challenging and depends on Hill-Sachs engagement. Remplissage, a capsulotenodesis procedure, added to Bankart reduces recurrence, especially for engaging lesions. For bone loss over 20%, bony augmentation like Latarjet is preferred, though it has higher complication rates. Large defects (30-40% loss) may require distal tibia or iliac crest allografts. Open Bankart helps in failed arthroscopic repairs with minimal bone loss. Newer arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstructions using distal clavicle or distal tibia grafts with metal button fixation show promise. O'Brien emphasizes careful preoperative imaging and early surgery after initial dislocations to optimize outcomes and prevent failure, tailoring treatment by bone loss and lesion engagement.
Asset Caption
Michael O’Brien, MD
Keywords
arthroscopic Bankart repair
anterior shoulder instability
glenoid bone loss
Hill-Sachs lesion
Latarjet procedure
×
Please select your language
1
English