false
OasisLMS
Catalog
APEX Knee Navigating Pearls and Pitfalls
Smaller Lesion Debate: MFX vs Autograft Transfer 1 ...
Smaller Lesion Debate: MFX vs Autograft Transfer 1 (Faucett)
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
Video Summary
Scott Fawcett from the Centers for Advanced Orthopedics discusses treatment options for small cartilage lesions—microfracture versus autograft transfer. He emphasizes thorough clinical and radiographic evaluation, lesion size, location, subchondral bone quality, and patient activity goals. Microfracture, a marrow stimulation technique, suits smaller, difficult-to-access lesions and complex topographies. Autograft transfer is preferable for larger, weight-bearing lesions, damaged subchondral bone, and uncontained defects, though it requires longer healing. Rehabilitation is critical post-treatment. Proper patient selection and addressing alignment or other knee issues are key. Both treatments show similar midterm success for small lesions, but choice depends on lesion specifics and patient factors.
Asset Caption
Scott C. Faucett, M.D., M.S.
Keywords
cartilage lesions
microfracture
autograft transfer
subchondral bone
rehabilitation
×
Please select your language
1
English